The Evolution of a Time-Honored Tradition – The 2008 Ryder Cup

The Ryder Cup is one of the most famous golf traditions today. During its 77 years of history, the Ryder Cup has become an event golfers don’t want to miss. Fans visit different locations around the world every two years to witness the best American and European professional golfers facing in friendly, yet intense and competitive matches. This year PGA America has revised the Ryder Cup point system, which determines the top eight players for the 2008 American Ryder Cup team. This change in structure will make it harder for American professionals to get a place in the team. In addition, for changes in the points system, the 2008 American Ryder Cup captain Paul Azinger 2008 now has four captain’s choices instead of the traditional two.

A Time of Change: 2008 Ryder Cup Qualification

The selection of the American Ryder Cup squad has always been a competitive and interesting process. The selection process will be even more interesting because a new point system is practiced and American captain Paul Azinger has made his last four player choices. The new point system starts with four major golf championships: Masters, U.S. Open, British Open and PGA Championship. Players will receive one point for every $ 1000.00 they make on this event. From 1 January 2008 to 11 August, prospective players will receive one point for every $ 1000.00 earned in official events. Exceptions include the 2008 major championship, where potential players earn two points for every $ 1,000.00, and the event is played opposite the main championship and the World Golf Championship event, where potential team members earn half a point for every $ 1,000.00. Because the 2006 point system works until the new system is announced at the end of last year, all potential US players who are in the top ten on all official events between 11 August and 5 November 2006 will be given a quarter point for every $ 1000.00 win.

Paul Azinger leaves his signature at the 2008 Ryder Cup

Azinger, the 2008 American captain, was partially responsible for changing Ryder Cup qualification criteria. In November 2006, Doug Ferguson, a golf writer with the Associated Press, reported that Azinger had persuaded the American PGA to improve the point system and give him four captain’s choices. In his article, Ferguson quotes Azinger. “I will be blamed if it doesn’t work,” Azinger told Ferguson, “I want some credit if it works.” Changes in the qualification process will make potential players work harder for selection and no one will get their place in the team until after the 2008 PGA Championship. Azinger will have up to a week before the Ryder Cup to announce the selection of four captains, unlike in the years before when the captain’s choice was announced right after the PGA Championship. “I like the idea of ​​choosing four players,” Azinger told the Associated Press on November 6. “I like the idea that I don’t have to choose them immediately after the PGA Championship. I have no other chance. The Ryder Cup captain has done it, and I really appreciate that,” he continued.

2008 Ryder Cup: Creating a New Tradition and Celebrating the Past

The 2008 Ryder Cup competition is scheduled for September 19-21 2008 and will be held at the prestigious Valhalla Golf Club in Louisville, Kentucky. Valhalla Golf Club has held two PGA Championships and one PGA Senior Championship. In the past the American team has dominated the Ryder Cup, but in recent history European teams have won in succession and this year the American team hopes to reclaim the Ryder Cup, which they have not held since 1999. Captain Paul Azinger will compete against one Europe’s favorite golf professional, European captain Nick Faldo. Faldo and Azinger have a history related to the Ryder Cup. In 1993 they competed in one of the most memorable Ryder Cup matches. When the official event took place throughout 2007, golf enthusiasts will definitely watch carefully to see which players get points under the new qualification system and eagerly await Azinger’s choice in 2008.

Blood Clotting – The Rescue Squad

When you have a wound, what prevents your body from drying out the circulating blood in your body?

The technical description of this process is when blood platelets work together to form thrombus in the coagulation cascade. The term lay is the formation of blood clots.

For example, when you cut vegetables for dinner and you slip and cut your skin nerve impulses race to the brain at 250 miles per hour. Your brain recognizes the site of injury and platelets begin to fuse at the point of injury.

Interestingly, when platelets attach to the injured area, platelets release chemicals that warn other platelets to come and help stop blood flow. After enough platelets meet in the area, a coagulation cascade is developed. According to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Medicine, “The purpose of the cascade is to form fibrin, which will form nets in the platelet aggregate to stabilize clots. All factors have an inactive and active form. Once activated, these factors will function to activate factors next in sequence until fibrin is formed. “[1]

Wikipedia describes fibrin as, “[A] a protein involved in blood clotting. This is a fibrillary protein that is polymerized to form a” mesh “that forms a hemostatic clot or clot (in conjunction with platelets) above the site of the wound.” [2]

In essence, when our body is injured, the rescue team is sent to stop the flow, provide a sophisticated cover and speed up the healing process.

The presence of platelets in the human body is a remarkable mechanism for preserving life in the event of lacerations.

The above description of how this system works is stripped to make it easier to understand. The fact is that the blood clotting system in the human body is very complex. Without the right components in the right amount, activated at the right time blood clots will not work and the organism will not survive.

The blood clotting system is what is called a “simplified complex system”. This means that if there is an important part missing, the whole process will be damaged and not work. Then how can this system evolve through a gradual natural process if all parts must be involved to function? Evolutionists can only produce stories. They do not provide evidence of how this complex system can emerge. If it is difficult to give an explanation or even a shred of evidence for just one of the many complex systems in the human body, how can anyone believe that the whole body coalesces by chance through an evolutionary process?

Did the human body evolve or adapt through natural selection by utilizing this freezing feature or is the freezing mechanism in our body designed because without it we would be extinct?

The fact that there is even a discussion that a complex blood clotting system can be formed by Darwin’s evolutionary process in stages, itself makes no sense. A rational and honest person will never believe that this is the result of anything other than proper engineering by superior intelligence.

Understanding Team Dynamics in Sport

Using the Athlete DISC to Create High Performance Teams

Great teamwork happens when those on the team have a philosophy of being the best person for the team rather than the best person in the team. Often athletes compete brutally against each other in order to be selected on the team and then once they are on the team, they are expected to put the team first. This is quite a departure from their previous thinking when they had to fight for themselves. However, if their thinking does not change, then we end up with a non-united team. A team of individuals. A team that without question, will fail to produce their best when it matters the most. As coaches, we may or may not have a role in selecting our team. Some do and some don’t. Regardless of this, every coach, must understand the interplay of behavioural styles / personalities that exist of their team. This interplay is called Team Dynamics and just by observing a team, it can be quite a challenge to accurately understand the diverse mix of these styles. To fully and accurately understand, coaches can turn to the Athlete DISC and the Team Dynamics Profiling. After all, most teams fail due to clashes of behaviour patterns (“personality clashes”). Clashes that could have been managed had the coach and team been aware of them.

Creating Great Teams

Some coaches assume any group can automatically be a team. One of the biggest single reasons that teams misfire is that personality differences are ignored. In short, who’s selected for the team will affect the outcome. For best results, we must be strategic about the athletes on the team, what their behavioural style is and what the outcome of these behavioural styles is in creating the Team Dynamics Profile. With this knowledge coaches can begin to understand likely team behaviours and the most effective way to coach the overall team. Coaches can also see where gaps are in the team’s diversity and can, where able, recruit athletes of particular profiles to fill those gaps.

When coaches create a sporting team and employ their knowledge of the four Athlete DISC behavioral styles, they can greatly improve the team’s chances for success. Coaches will need to take into account that there are natural allies and antagonists among the styles and also that each style functions best at a different phase in the life cycle of a team. For information on Team Development Stages, stay tuned as an article is coming out soon on this topic.

For example, Interactive styles (I’s) often see Compliant styles (C’s) as overly-analytical and rule governed. Dominant styles (D’s) might sooner die than have to continually wait on the more considerate style of the Steady team members (S’s). Compliant styles, while often drawn to Steady styles, have difficulty understanding the Interactive style’s lack of focus or the Dominant style’s impatience. And Steady styles only wish everyone was as amiable and tolerant as they. So while the potential for conflict is always there, it needn’t become the reality. In creating a team, think about who you are putting on it and monitor how they function during the group’s evolution. That way you’ll not only make the best possible use of the strengths of each team member, you can help create a whole that’s much larger than the sum of the parts. Discovering what styles you have on your team is easy. When each of your team, complete an Athlete DISC Profile, they will be mapped onto a Team Dynamics Chart like the one below.

Visit our site to see the article on this topic and view the Dynamics Profile Chart.

In the Team Dynamics Profile example, a coach can see that there are two different percentage measures in each Behavioural Style. The first percentage is the Norm Group. The norm group is a measure of the % of team members that theoretically form a healthy amount of a certain behavioural style. The other percentage is Your Group. This is the actual percentage of a certain behavioural style that exists in your team.

The first aspect to look at in the Team Dynamics Profile, is the Norm Group vs Your Group percentage. We ideally want these percentages to map to the theory percentages. Successful teams tend to have healthy diversity within the behavioural profiles. Can you think of what may occur if one behavioural style is oversupplied?

In the above example, the first team issue to notice is the lack of D’s. In teams, D’s provide a sense of urgency, a pace setting style of leadership, a love of a challenge, a strong results focus and a what ever it takes style of play. What do you think may be the outcome for a team that is missing these qualities? Think about team members who naturally want to assume a leadership role, what profile do you think they are most likely?

The second observation is that there are too many I’s. Interactive (I) style behaviours are fast paced, people oriented, motivated by change and fun, are impulsive with their choices, will be interested in the social side of sport as well as the need for individual recognition. As well, I’s are talkative types who tend to wear there heart on their sleeve more so than the other styles. With roughly twice as many I’s as the theory suggests is required, this team will likely struggle at times to switch on a focus. There may be a lot of off topic communication and if their coach does not provide excitement and fun elements at training, then they will start to disengage.

The other factor in this team, is that their Steady style (S) is under represented. S styles are described as the ultimate team player. They listen, are observant of others, portray tolerance, are highly amiable and generally will naturally put the team before themselves. Some describe S’s as the glue that binds the team together. What do you think may happen in this team given that there are not enough of the S’s?

Finally, the Compliant style. You will notice that this style is also over represented by 25%. Compliant styles (C’s) are rule guided, motivated by structure and systems being effective and efficient, are stubborn and inflexible to change unless there is sufficient evidence such as facts and figures to support the change. They are also likely to be highly conscious of quality above all else, are interested in the “right” process before the result and are more a thinker than a feeler who will be reticent to express themselves. Whilst fantastic people to have on a team, they can often be prone to preferring to work alone. So knowing this what impact do you think the impact on the team will be?

In summary, Team Dynamics Profiling gives us concrete indications on how the team will bond, interact and ultimately perform. Obtaining accurate information on Team Dynamics is easy and inexpensive using the Athlete DISC Profiling system. I have noticed that when teams significantly underperform, there is almost always critical behavioural issues (“personality clashes”) that were never addressed by the coach. Sport is tough enough. Coaching is one of the most challenging roles a person can have. In a recent survey of elite coaches from a diversity of sports, coaches rated the three most challenging aspects of their roles. 50% rated “Understanding individual athlete’s personality and how to best motivate them”. 46% rated “Personal life balance – managing sport, career, home and social life.” And 31% rated “Team/squad dynamics and managing relationships within the team/squad”. Don’t make your job any harder by neglecting this critical aspect of team performance. Use the knowledge available with Athlete Assessments and the Athlete DISC to assist you to make better informed decisions.